Rank #8 of 10

Hyperliquid trader 0xebcd…fcf4

Measured from public Hyperliquid fill data over a rolling 30-day window: composite score, risk-adjusted return, trade quality and the share of mirrored capital this address currently receives in the HyperMirror basket.

In short

Trader 0xebcd…fcf4 currently ranks #8 in the HyperMirror basket with a composite score of 88 and an allocation weight of 10.0%. Over the last 30 days the address recorded 493 closed trades at a 72.2% realised win rate and a profit factor of 16.32, against +14.07% ROI.

In the Elite setElite membership is sticky — a higher score elsewhere never forces a swap, and removal follows the documented replacement policy.

How selection works · Policy v3 table

Composite score
88
Allocation weight
10.0%
30D ROI
+14.07%
Win rate
72.2%
Profit factor
16.32
Closed trades (30D)
493
Closed PnL (30D)
$166,661
Account equity
$153,914
Largest win
$18,896
Largest loss
-$4,765
Open positions
3
Margin used
$41,070
Unrealised PnL
$104,506
Largest position
BTC $1,679,328
7D ROI
+12.77%
Average trade
$338.06
Fill history
64 days

Snapshot recorded 2026-08-15 14:55 UTC. Metrics are measured from public Hyperliquid fill data, not self-reported.

Performance

Equity and PnL curves

Both series come from the same public fill and account data used for scoring. Curves are snapshot samples, not tick-level history, so read the shape rather than any single point.

Account equity — 30 days

$638,235

+$50,241 over the window

Start

$587,993

End

$638,235

Low

$556,709

High

$659,048

40 snapshot points, 30-day window · 2026-07-152026-08-13 UTC

Cumulative PnL — 30 days

$56,262

+$56,262 over the window

Start

$0.00

End

$56,262

Low

-$41,056

High

$76,343

40 snapshot points, 30-day window · 2026-07-152026-08-13 UTC

Account equity — 7 days

$636,189

+$73,572 over the window

Start

$562,616

End

$636,189

Low

$562,259

High

$645,197

40 snapshot points, 7-day window · 2026-08-082026-08-13 UTC

Cumulative PnL — 7 days

$43,504

+$43,504 over the window

Start

$0.00

End

$43,504

Low

-$4,124

High

$52,512

40 snapshot points, 7-day window · 2026-08-082026-08-13 UTC

Windows

7 days versus 30 days

A trader can look excellent over one week and mediocre over a month. Both windows are shown side by side so the difference is visible instead of averaged away.

Trade metrics for 0xebcd…fcf4 across the 7-day and 30-day measurement windows.
Metric7 days30 days
ROI+12.77%+14.07%
Win rate75.3%72.2%
Profit factor439.1516.32
Closed PnL$100,971$166,661
Average trade$1,086$338.06
Closed trades93493
Winning trades70356
Losing trades23137
Largest win$18,896$18,896
Largest loss-$53.93-$4,765

How this ROI was calculated

The 30-day figure uses the "pnl_first" estimator. No deposits or withdrawals were detected in the window. For reference: equity-based +11.35%, deposit-adjusted +11.35%, PnL-based +14.07%. We publish all three because a single ROI number can be manufactured by moving capital in and out.

Open book

Current positions

Positions are public on Hyperliquid. This is the book as of the snapshot above — verify it on-chain before drawing conclusions.

Open positions held by 0xebcd…fcf4 at the snapshot timestamp.
MarketSideLeverageSizeEntryLiquidationUnrealised PnLMargin usedNotional
BTCSHORT40x25$67,173$81,120$103,754$39,389$1,679,328
ETHSHORT20x7.8$1,889$59,460$42.61$734.53$14,733
SOLSHORT20x250.81$78.31$1,857$709.52$946.56$19,641

How to read these numbers

A single ROI figure is the least informative number on this page. ROI over 30 days rewards leverage and timing as much as skill, and it says nothing about how the return was earned. Profit factor and win rate together describe the shape of the edge: a low win rate with a profit factor above 1 is a trend-following signature, while a high win rate with a profit factor near 1 usually means small wins funded by occasional large losses — the profile most likely to end in a liquidation.

For 0xebcd…fcf4 specifically, the largest single loss over the window was -$4,765 against an average closed trade of $338.06 — roughly 14.1× the average result, across 356 winning and 137 losing trades measured over 64 days of on-chain fills. That ratio, not the ROI headline, is what determines whether a bad week is survivable.

The composite score exists because no single metric survives contact with a regime change. It combines realised PnL consistency, win rate, profit factor, position discipline and account survivability, so one strong month cannot buy a place in the basket. The full formula is documented on the methodology page.

Why we do not recommend copying this address alone

Mirroring one wallet means its drawdown is your entire drawdown, and its largest position is by construction your largest position. On perpetuals a single liquidation is not a drawdown you sit through — it permanently removes the capital that would have compounded. HyperMirror allocates across up to ten scored addresses, each isolated in its own sub-account so their positions cannot net against one another.

See single trader vs basket and sub-account isolation for the mechanics.

Keep reading

Related

Full ranked basket

Every scored address, with weight, ROI and profit factor side by side, on the Hyperliquid trader rankings.

How selection works

Selection criteria, red flags and replacement discipline in best Hyperliquid traders to copy.

Mirror the whole basket.
Not one lucky trader.

Score-weighted allocation across up to 10 isolated sub-accounts. Trade-only permissions — your funds never leave your account.

Non-custodial · Agent cannot withdraw · Cancel delegation anytime