About HyperMirror

Why we built it

Hyperliquid makes every position and every fill public. That removes the hardest problem in copy trading — you no longer have to trust a self-reported track record, because the record is on-chain and verifiable by anyone. What remained was the harder judgement call: public leaderboards rank by outcome, and outcome over a short window rewards leverage and survivorship rather than skill.

So we built the measurement layer we wanted to use ourselves. Traders are scored on the shape of their returns, not the size of them, and capital is spread across a basket in proportion to score. One trader can have a bad month; a scored, isolated book is built to survive it.

What we can and cannot do

The permission model is the most important thing to understand before depositing anything, so it is stated plainly rather than buried.

How we publish numbers

Performance figures on this site come from Hyperliquid's own on-chain data, recorded as periodic snapshots and timestamped where displayed. We publish the weighted basket result rather than the best individual trader, and we do not remove traders from the historical record after they underperform. The scoring inputs are documented on the methodology page and the loss controls on the risk architecture page.

Past performance does not predict future returns. Trading perpetual futures involves substantial risk of loss, including the loss of your entire deposit, and nothing on this site is investment advice.

Contact

For support, security disclosures, partnership enquiries or press, email info@hypermirror.io. Security reports are read first. We will never ask you for a private key, a seed phrase, or a withdrawal signature — any message that does is not from us.