Rank #4 of 10

Hyperliquid trader 0xe7f3…200b

Measured from public Hyperliquid fill data over a rolling 30-day window: composite score, risk-adjusted return, trade quality and the share of mirrored capital this address currently receives in the HyperMirror basket.

In short

Trader 0xe7f3…200b currently ranks #4 in the HyperMirror basket with a composite score of 66 and an allocation weight of 10.0%. Over the last 30 days the address recorded 1,142 closed trades at a 96.8% realised win rate and a profit factor of 13.72, against +98.04% ROI.

In the Elite setElite membership is sticky — a higher score elsewhere never forces a swap, and removal follows the documented replacement policy.

How selection works · Policy v3 table

Composite score
66
Allocation weight
10.0%
30D ROI
+98.04%
Win rate
96.8%
Profit factor
13.72
Closed trades (30D)
1,142
Closed PnL (30D)
$205,829
Account equity
$96,252
Largest win
$13,034
Largest loss
-$5,093
Open positions
0
Margin used
n/a
Unrealised PnL
n/a
Largest position
n/a
7D ROI
+23.39%
Average trade
$180.24
Fill history
27 days

Snapshot recorded 2026-08-15 14:55 UTC. Metrics are measured from public Hyperliquid fill data, not self-reported.

Performance

Equity and PnL curves

Both series come from the same public fill and account data used for scoring. Curves are snapshot samples, not tick-level history, so read the shape rather than any single point.

Account equity — 30 days

$641,982

+$389,884 over the window

Start

$252,099

End

$641,982

Low

$235,446

High

$680,221

40 snapshot points, 30-day window · 2026-07-152026-08-13 UTC

Cumulative PnL — 30 days

$164,907

+$164,907 over the window

Start

$0.00

End

$164,907

Low

-$16,653

High

$203,145

40 snapshot points, 30-day window · 2026-07-152026-08-13 UTC

Account equity — 7 days

$641,982

+$55,037 over the window

Start

$586,946

End

$641,982

Low

$577,893

High

$680,221

40 snapshot points, 7-day window · 2026-08-082026-08-13 UTC

Cumulative PnL — 7 days

$55,037

+$55,037 over the window

Start

$0.00

End

$55,037

Low

-$9,053

High

$93,275

40 snapshot points, 7-day window · 2026-08-082026-08-13 UTC

Windows

7 days versus 30 days

A trader can look excellent over one week and mediocre over a month. Both windows are shown side by side so the difference is visible instead of averaged away.

Trade metrics for 0xe7f3…200b across the 7-day and 30-day measurement windows.
Metric7 days30 days
ROI+23.39%+98.04%
Win rate100.0%96.8%
Profit factor99.0013.72
Closed PnL$94,051$205,829
Average trade$120.58$180.24
Closed trades7801,142
Winning trades7801,106
Losing trades036
Largest win$13,034$13,034
Largest loss$0.00-$5,093

How this ROI was calculated

The 30-day figure uses the "pnl_first" estimator. 2 capital movements (deposit or withdrawal) were detected in the window, which is why a raw equity comparison would be misleading here. For reference: equity-based +107.95%, deposit-adjusted +72.89%, PnL-based +98.04%. We publish all three because a single ROI number can be manufactured by moving capital in and out.

How to read these numbers

A single ROI figure is the least informative number on this page. ROI over 30 days rewards leverage and timing as much as skill, and it says nothing about how the return was earned. Profit factor and win rate together describe the shape of the edge: a low win rate with a profit factor above 1 is a trend-following signature, while a high win rate with a profit factor near 1 usually means small wins funded by occasional large losses — the profile most likely to end in a liquidation.

For 0xe7f3…200b specifically, the largest single loss over the window was -$5,093 against an average closed trade of $180.24 — roughly 28.3× the average result, across 1,106 winning and 36 losing trades measured over 27 days of on-chain fills. That ratio, not the ROI headline, is what determines whether a bad week is survivable.

The composite score exists because no single metric survives contact with a regime change. It combines realised PnL consistency, win rate, profit factor, position discipline and account survivability, so one strong month cannot buy a place in the basket. The full formula is documented on the methodology page.

Why we do not recommend copying this address alone

Mirroring one wallet means its drawdown is your entire drawdown, and its largest position is by construction your largest position. On perpetuals a single liquidation is not a drawdown you sit through — it permanently removes the capital that would have compounded. HyperMirror allocates across up to ten scored addresses, each isolated in its own sub-account so their positions cannot net against one another.

See single trader vs basket and sub-account isolation for the mechanics.

Keep reading

Related

Full ranked basket

Every scored address, with weight, ROI and profit factor side by side, on the Hyperliquid trader rankings.

How selection works

Selection criteria, red flags and replacement discipline in best Hyperliquid traders to copy.

Mirror the whole basket.
Not one lucky trader.

Score-weighted allocation across up to 10 isolated sub-accounts. Trade-only permissions — your funds never leave your account.

Non-custodial · Agent cannot withdraw · Cancel delegation anytime