pvp.trade
pvp.trade made Hyperliquid social: trading with friends, in a group, where the feed is part of the experience. HyperMirror is the opposite temperament — a system designed to run without conversation, where the interesting question is not what the group is doing but what the scores say.
In short
pvp.trade is a social, group-oriented way to trade Hyperliquid, where visibility and shared activity are the point. HyperMirror is a non-custodial autopilot: composite scores select up to 10 leaders into a sticky basket, capital is weighted by score, each leader is isolated in a dedicated sub-account, and emergency removal and soft-issue-strike replacement happen on measured rule breaches rather than group sentiment or relative score.
| Dimension | HyperMirror | pvp.trade |
|---|---|---|
| Primary venue | Hyperliquid only | Hyperliquid |
| Custody model | Non-custodial; funds stay in your own Hyperliquid account | Non-custodial in its on-chain design; verify current mechanics in its docs |
| Permission model | Trade-only agent approval plus a separate builder-fee approval | On-chain permissions granted from your wallet |
| Can the operator withdraw your funds? | No — withdrawals and transfers stay wallet-only | Not in a non-custodial design — confirm with the provider |
| What you copy | A curated basket of up to 10 scored elite Hyperliquid traders | People in your group or feed, chosen socially |
| Portfolio construction | Score-weighted allocation; 1 leader in Starter mode, up to 10 in Full mode | Ad hoc: driven by who you follow and what the group does |
| Position isolation / netting | One isolated sub-account per leader; no netting between leaders | Typically one account, so positions net |
| Leader replacement policy | Sticky basket: immediate removal on an emergency, otherwise 3 strike-days of documented soft issues | Not documented as a fixed rule set — rotation is left to the user or to the provider's discretion |
| Fee model | 0.1% builder fee on mirrored notional volume; no profit share | Check the provider's current fee terms |
| Transparency | On-chain: every fill sits under your own address | On-chain, with social visibility as a feature |
| Ops burden | Hosted autopilot; nothing to run or host yourself | You participate actively; the experience assumes attention |
| Best for | Someone who wants diversified Hyperliquid exposure without giving up custody | Traders who want a social, high-engagement environment |
HyperMirror fits when you want an unattended allocation driven by measured trader quality rather than by what is being discussed.
pvp.trade may fit better when the social layer is genuinely what you want — trading with a group, in the open, with people you know.
Both stay on-chain and both avoid taking deposits, so the custody comparison is short. What differs is what the social layer does to behaviour rather than to security: when positions are visible and shared in real time, decisions get made faster and with more reference to other people. That is a feature if you want engagement and a hazard if you are trying to avoid correlated, sentiment-driven positioning.
HyperMirror keeps the permission surface deliberately minimal — one trade-only agent approval, one builder-fee approval, both revocable from your wallet — and keeps behaviour out of the loop entirely by removing the moment where you decide.
Social trading products monetise in varied ways — activity-linked fees, spread or referral economics — so the honest comparison is by fee type rather than by number; check the provider's own terms for what applies today.
HyperMirror's model is one line: 0.1% of mirrored notional volume via Hyperliquid's builder-fee mechanism, no profit share, no subscription. The incentive it creates is transparent and worth stating: fee revenue scales with turnover, so an active basket costs more than a quiet one at equal profitability.
In a social environment the selection mechanism is affinity. You copy people you know, people who are performing loudly, or people the group is discussing. That mechanism has real information in it sometimes, and it also has a well-documented failure mode: attention concentrates on recent winners, which is precisely when a run is most likely to be regime luck.
HyperMirror scores public fill history — realized PnL consistency, win rate, profit factor, position discipline, account survivability — and lets the composite score decide who is in the basket and how much they get. Sub-account isolation then keeps each leader's exposure separate, so a group of leaders cannot quietly net into a flat book inside one account.
Social settings tend to concentrate risk exactly when they should diversify it: everyone crowds the same trade, and when it turns, it turns for the whole group at once. There is no structural mechanism separating one participant's mistake from another's.
The basket approach imposes structure instead. Weights follow scores, so no single leader dominates by force of personality; soft-issue strikes and replacement trigger on measured decline rather than on mood, never on relative score alone; emergency removal exists for severe events. This reduces single-leader concentration but does nothing about a correlated market move that hurts every leader simultaneously.
Choose HyperMirror if: you want the decision-making removed rather than socialised, you want diversification enforced by structure, and you would rather not watch a feed to know whether your system is healthy.
Choose pvp.trade if: you want the social experience itself, you trade with a group you trust, or you want fast, discretionary participation rather than a maintained allocation.
Where HyperMirror is limited: no social layer and no discretionary override of leader selection; Hyperliquid only; one leader below the $100k unlock; and margin fragmented across isolated sub-accounts.
Where pvp.trade is limited: selection driven by attention rather than by measured history; crowding risk when a group converges on one trade; and typically no per-leader isolation or systematic replacement process.
HyperMirror's side of every row above follows one published rule set. The Elite basket is sticky: a leader stays mirrored until a rule removes them, and a higher-scoring wallet elsewhere never forces a swap. Emergencies — account value below roughly $1,000, or no fill for 96 hours or more combined with zero trades in 7 days — remove a leader immediately. Everything softer accrues at most one strike per wallet per UTC calendar day, with three strike-days triggering replacement and a clean day resetting the counter; drawdown for that test is measured on jump-adjusted equity so deposits and withdrawals are not read as trading losses, and ROI is measured from PnL. The full table is on How it works and in the documentation.
Structure changes which risks you carry, not whether you carry risk. Nothing on this page is a return estimate, a recommendation, or a claim about another provider's results — check any provider's own documentation before deciding.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Perpetual futures are leveraged instruments and carry a substantial risk of loss, including the loss of your entire position.
Methodology
Scoring and replacement are documented in full on How it works and in the Docs (Policy v3). In short: the Elite basket is sticky, emergencies remove a leader immediately, and soft issues accrue at most one strike per UTC day with three strike-days triggering replacement. Read how it works or the documentation for the full table.
Questions
Yes. The leaderboard shows the current leaders and weights, and the activity feed shows basket-level trading — but there is no social layer or chat.
It is different. It optimises for engagement, which is a legitimate thing to want; it just tends to select on visibility rather than on evidence.
Only in the sense that Hyperliquid is a public chain — positions under your address are on-chain like any other. Nothing is broadcast socially by the product.
No. The only fee is 0.1% of mirrored notional volume through Hyperliquid's builder-fee mechanism.
Keep reading
Score-weighted allocation across up to 10 elite Hyperliquid traders, each isolated in its own sub-account. Your funds never leave your account.
Non-custodial · Agent cannot withdraw · Cancel delegation anytime
